Funnelsight is a fictional company. This site was built as a training project and does not offer a real product.

Moving upmarket: why the enterprise pipeline falls short

Illustrative example. Contractly is a fictional company, and the figures are illustrative, not measured results.

At a glance

Two quarters after Contractly started selling to large companies, pipeline coverage for the next two quarters stood at 2.8 times the target. The team needs 4, because roughly one opportunity in four closes. Sign-ups were down 18% and demo requests from large companies reached half the plan. The first reaction in the room was the usual one: it's marketing. Three fixes came up: doubling the paid budget, rewriting the whole website for enterprise buyers, or lowering the MQL bar to give sales more leads.

Before picking one, the team filtered its funnel in Funnelsight on the target accounts, from the campaign to the first sales contact. It then read the new audience stage by stage. Each stage was compared with what this audience should look like, not with the small businesses the team knew.

The new audience, stage by stage

Leads from large companies, last quarter, read stage by stage. Illustrative data
QuestionWhat the data showsReading
Do large companies come?22% of new leads, up from 8%Working
Are they the right people?46% in the target audience, meaning a legal, procurement or finance role in a country with a sales teamMarketing fix
Are they as active as other leads?2.1 actions on average in their first two weeks, against 4.8 for small businessesExpected
Does sales reach them?30% of target accounts contacted within two weeksRouting leak
Do they close?Too early to read: the sales cycle is about six monthsRead later

Marketing had part of it wrong. The paid campaigns targeted large companies by size alone. They did reach them, but more than half of the leads were IT staff curious about the tool, or people in countries where Contractly had no one to sell. Doubling that budget would have bought more of the same leads.

Lower activity on average wasn't the problem. A large account sends two kinds of people. Practitioners such as contract managers and in-house lawyers try the product, often several per company. The people who decide read a comparison, join a webinar and rarely log in. Averaged together, they look less active than a small business, where one person does both. Lowering the MQL bar to match small-business activity would have filled the sales queue with small trials.

The biggest leak was in the handoff. The practitioners were the signal. Most of them didn't ask for a demo. They started a self-serve trial instead, sometimes three or four colleagues from the same company. Read person by person, they looked like small trials, and no one in sales saw them. Grouped by account, 35 target companies had three or more people trying the product.

What changed

The budget stayed where it was, and so did most of the website. In this illustrative scenario, leads from the target audience rose to 65% the following quarter. Pipeline coverage came back to 3.6 times the target.

What to copy

See where your own funnel leaks, stage by stage and account by account.

Start free trial